Wednesday, October 15, 2014

Writing Wrongs

Posted By on Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 9:43 AM

Anyone embarking on a career or avocation in writing has learned the well-worn admonishment that "Great writers are great readers." Prolific novelist Stephen King expresses it in the converse: "If you don't have time to read, you don't have the time (or the tools) to write. Simple as that."

Well, I've discovered an addendum to that. Reading manuscripts for So It Goes, The Literary Magazine of the Kurt Vonnegut Memorial Library definitely has been improving my writing. Last month, the editors completed reviews of unsolicited manuscripts to the third edition, which is currently working its way through layout and proofreading. I've been lucky to do this for all three editions.

Now, there's an art to submitting to reviewers who have their own predilections about what they think will proudly represent the tone and style of the magazine they're publishing. Yes, it's all subjective. But in serving on the other side of the gate rather than trying to storm it, I've definitely noticed a few common traits that will not pass muster and qualify more as major transgressions than minor peccadilloes.

click to enlarge Sometimes the worst writing provides the very best lessons. - HUGH VANDIVIER
  • Hugh Vandivier
  • Sometimes the worst writing provides the very best lessons.

Follow directions

This seems obvious, right? Well, it's funny how some writers will completely ignore the simplest instruction. "1,500 words? Bah, I'm going to submit that tome I wrote about a Brussels sprouts farmer in Bardstown, Kentucky, that I've blindly submitted to 12 other literary journals this morning."

If the issue has a theme (volume 3 of So it Goes is The Creative Process), don't ignore the theme, thinking your prose poem about bards in Brussels will squeak in even though it had nothing to do with creativity.

As a reviewer, I don't care how much of an iconoclast Vonnegut was. I won't even read a manuscript that doesn't abide by the word limit. Failing to follow directions doesn't show reviewers how much of a maverick you are; it just pisses them off.

Pace yourself

Some writers do a good job of keeping to the word limit. But from reading through their prose, it's evident that they took too long to get to the heart of the narrative. They'll start with a long exposition and generous descriptions of the Belgian countryside and exhaustive details about the bard's getup and plumed hat. Then, sensing the dwindling supply of space, they'll whisk through all the action of the bard's travails. Vonnegut himself said it best, "Every sentence must do one of two things — reveal character or advance the action." And also "Start as close to the end as possible."

Revise, revise, revise

Which brings up some crucial points. Craft your narrative. Refine each sentence. Make sure each word should be there. Yes, catch the reader's attention, but don't waste his or her time.

Write in your own voice

Unless it's a fanzine, don't submit fan fiction. For the Vonnegut Library's magazine, the purpose is to showcase those unique voices that show the same spirit as its namesake. The chronicles of Dwayne Hoover and Kilgore Trout have already been written. Create your own characters and do what Vonnegut prescribed: "Be a sadist. No matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them — in order that the reader may see what they are made of."

Accept rejection

I can tell you that when reviewing dozens of manuscripts, you can easily get catty about an especially poorly chosen comparison, a clever premise that's not well executed or the misfortune of writing on the same theme as two other submissions. I share great empathy with writers whom I've had a hand in rejecting, especially those that are oh, so close. But if you're expecting a glowing acceptance on your first submission, prepare for disappointment. And if you want to see what rejection looks like, the Vonnegut Library has boxes of rejection letters the author received when he was starting out.

click to enlarge Kurt Vonnegut's collection of rejection letters was his testament to the fact that successful writers must persevere. - HUGH VANDIVIER
  • Hugh Vandivier
  • Kurt Vonnegut's collection of rejection letters was his testament to the fact that successful writers must persevere.

Learn from the masters

When Elmore Leonard dispensed his 10 simple rules for writing, he started with "Never open a book with weather." I can tell you that from reading too many opening paragraphs that begin this way, when writing from this point forward I have absolutely no desire to describe the sky or how it looked that day or concoct some clever metaphor or fish through a big box of Crayola crayons for the perfect color name to randomly depict how the clouds looked that particular day in that season and that climate.

Maybe I should revise that last sentence before I submit it.

  • Pin It
  • Favorite
  • Email

Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Speaking of...

  • The Nice Things

    Ben has enjoyed his opportunity to give notice to some of Indy’s 'nice things' with Sky Blue Window readers. He hopes you’ll find and share them too.
    • Mar 9, 2016
  • Seeking Submissions

    The Kurt Vonnegut Memorial Library challenges writers of every stripe to submit their best work for this year’s So It Goes literary journal.
    • Mar 7, 2016
  • Best of the Rest: Feb. 26, 2016

    Take a look at the other arts and entertainment stories that made news in and around Indy this week.
    • Feb 26, 2016
  • More »

Comments

Subscribe to this thread:

Add a comment

Readers also liked…

  • Well-Endowed Artists

    Jennifer draws Seinfeld-esque parallels to artists' financial challenges with education, but offers easy ways to help.
    • Mar 2, 2016
  • Positive Impressions

    Ben chats with IMA’s artist-in-residence about introducing the process of woodblock printmaking to the masses.
    • Jan 10, 2016

About The Author

Hugh Vandivier

Hugh Vandivier

Bio:
Hugh Vandivier is an online editor for Angie’s List. He’s a proud alum and volunteer for Wabash College, holds an MSJ from Northwestern’s Medill School of Journalism and was a board member and director of grassroots arts nonprofit Primary Colours. He also interviewed Indy native Kurt Vonnegut, Jr. in 2002.

More by Hugh Vandivier

  • Recalling The Ban

    Hugh recalls his time last year holed up in the Kurt Vonnegut Memorial Library in support of banned and threatened books, and he tells of this year's Banned Books Week.
    • Sep 17, 2014
  • Inventive Incentives

    Hugh is happy to learn that there are others fighting to bring more film production to Indiana.
    • Sep 3, 2014
  • Theater Art

    Hugh discusses the fascinating collaboration and design process of IRT's poster art with artist Kyle Ragsdale and Janet Allen, the theater's executive artistic director.
    • Aug 20, 2014
  • More »

Latest in Sky Blue Blog

  • The Nice Things

    Ben has enjoyed his opportunity to give notice to some of Indy’s 'nice things' with Sky Blue Window readers. He hopes you’ll find and share them too.
    • Mar 9, 2016
  • A Gray Sky-onara

    Dan looks back at some of his most memorable blogs at Sky Blue Window.
    • Mar 8, 2016
  • Well-Endowed Artists

    Jennifer draws Seinfeld-esque parallels to artists' financial challenges with education, but offers easy ways to help.
    • Mar 2, 2016
  • More »
© 2017 CICF
Twitter
Facebook
Privacy Policy
Contact Us:
P: 317.634.2423   F: 317.684.0943
info@skybluewindow.org
Central Indiana Community Foundation
615 N. Alabama St. #119
Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-1431
Sky Blue Window is presented by:

Website powered by Foundation